Early-warning labor indicators

Through September 2026, no tracked U.S. group’s unemployment rate has moved by more than 0.8 points in a year.

By Last updated

United States: who is hurting, and where

GroupUnemployment rateChange, 12 monthsEmployed, share of populationOut 27+ weeks, share of unemployedMedian weeks
All workers4.2%−0.2 pts59.3%28.3%12
White-collar2.8%+0.0 ptsn/a32.1%14
Graduates 22–27 (bachelor’s+)6.0%−0.8 pts81.9%25.2%12
White-collar under 35 (early career)3.3%−0.4 ptsn/a26.4%12
White-collar 50+ (senior)2.6%+0.1 ptsn/a35.6%16

Unemployment rate and 12-month change are 3-month averages to September 2026; the other columns are the single latest month (September 2026). Not seasonally adjusted at source, so the 12-month change compares like months. The employed share is shown only for groups defined by age and education; the occupation groups are defined by a current or most recent job, so everyone in them has worked and the share would read near 100%. Small groups are noisy: graduates 22–27 have roughly 87 unemployed survey respondents in the latest month, so read a single month with care.

Unemployment rate, 3-month average, 2015 – Sep 2026
0%2%4%6%8%10%12%14%201520172019202120232025
  • Graduates 22–27 (bachelor’s+)
  • White-collar under 35 (early career)
  • White-collar 50+ (senior)
  • All workers

Is anyone a canary in the coal mine?

The data do not show a clean lead: young graduates and early-career white-collar workers tend to move with the wider market, not ahead of it, in the Jan 2010–Sep 2026 history.

Candidate signalCompared withResult
Graduates 22–27 (bachelor’s+)All workersMoves together (best at 0 months, r = 0.73)
Graduates 22–27 (bachelor’s+)White-collarMoves together (best at 0 months, r = 0.63)
Graduates 22–27 (bachelor’s+)White-collar 50+ (senior)Moves together (best at 0 months, r = 0.53)
White-collar under 35 (early career)All workersMoves together (best at 0 months, r = 0.80)
White-collar under 35 (early career)White-collarMoves together (best at 0 months, r = 0.88)
White-collar under 35 (early career)White-collar 50+ (senior)Moves together (best at 0 months, r = 0.69)

Method: for each month, the 12-month change in the 3-month-average unemployment rate of the candidate group is correlated with the same measure for the comparison group 0 to 12 months later. A group is called a leader only if the best lag is at least three months, the correlation is 0.4 or higher, and it beats the same-month correlation. March 2020 through February 2022 is left out, because the pandemic shock and rebound would otherwise dominate every comparison. The remaining history has no sharp downturn, so a lead that only appears in one would not show here. Correlation is not causation; treat this as a screen, not a forecast.

Job cuts that cite AI, by country

Layoff announcements NextChapter tracks where news coverage ties the cuts to AI, automation or machine learning, grouped by the country the company is based in.

MonthCountryCompanies citing AIAnnounced jobsCompanies saying AI is not the cause
October 2026United States79,1510
October 2026United Kingdom25,1000
October 2026Australia12,5001
October 2026France001
The 12 announcements behind these counts
  • Barclays (United Kingdom), 5,000 jobs: coverage ties it to AI · source
  • American Express (United States), 3,500 jobs: coverage ties it to AI · source
  • Kroger (United States), 3,000 jobs: coverage ties it to AI · source
  • National Australia Bank (Australia), 2,500 jobs: coverage ties it to AI · source
  • Atlassian (United States), 1,600 jobs: coverage ties it to AI · source
  • HubSpot (United States), 660 jobs: coverage ties it to AI · source
  • Flock Safety (United States), 270 jobs: coverage ties it to AI · source
  • Amazon (United States), 121 jobs: coverage ties it to AI · source
  • Westpac (Australia), 102 jobs: company said AI is not the cause
  • Telegraph Media Group (United Kingdom), 100 jobs: coverage ties it to AI · source
  • Ubisoft (France), 70 jobs: company said AI is not the cause
  • Qualcomm (United States), headcount not stated: coverage ties it to AI · source

This is what the coverage says each company claimed, counted once per company per month. It does not verify that AI was the cause: companies sometimes cite AI for cuts driven by cost or demand, and some say outright that AI is not the reason. Country is the company’s home country, not where the jobs are lost; a global cut counts at headquarters. It covers only announcements on NextChapter’s tracked list, so large announcements not on it are missing. Collection began in October 2026, so there is no earlier history. The AI-washing check on SEC restructuring filings in the monthly report tests the claim directly.

Compared with ten peer economies

Young workers everywhere are unemployed at a higher rate than the overall workforce. What matters for the canary question is whether that gap is widening, and whether it is widening more where AI adoption is higher or growth is weaker. Sorted by how much the youth-to-total ratio grew over the past year.

CountryYouth (15–24)All agesYouth ÷ allRatio, 12 mo agoAll-ages changeGraduate vs upper-secondary gapJobless 12+ monthsGDP growthFirms using AIJobs cut citing AI, tracked (Oct 2026)
United Kingdom · Jul 202615.6%4.7%3.32×3.04×−0.1 pts−1.1 pts23.3%+1.2% (2025)n/a5,100
France · Aug 202620.6%8.2%2.51×2.49×+0.4 pts−3.2 pts22.8%+0.9% (2025)18.2% (2025)0
Germany · Aug 20267.4%4.0%1.85×1.84×+0.2 pts+0.1 pts27.9%+0.2% (2025)26.0% (2025)0
Netherlands · Aug 20268.8%4.0%2.20×2.21×+0.1 pts−0.2 pts14.0%+1.6% (2025)33.2% (2025)0
United States · Sep 20269.9%4.2%2.36×2.36×−0.2 pts−2.4 pts13.8%+2.3% (2025)24.6% (2026-10)9,151
Australia · Sep 202611.1%4.7%2.36×2.36×+0.3 pts−1.8 pts21.5%+2.0% (2025)n/a2,500
Canada · Sep 202613.0%6.5%2.00×2.06×−0.6 pts−2.3 pts13.5%+1.9% (2025)n/a0
Spain · Aug 202622.7%10.0%2.27×2.38×−0.5 pts−4.6 pts32.1%+2.6% (2025)20.3% (2025)0
Italy · Aug 202620.3%6.2%3.27×3.47×+0.5 pts−2.5 pts52.8%+0.5% (2025)16.4% (2025)0
Japan · Aug 20263.5%2.5%1.40×1.62×−0.1 pts−2.4 pts30.8%+1.2% (2025)n/a0
Sweden · Aug 202623.0%8.9%2.58×2.86×+0.2 pts+0.6 pts18.2%+1.4% (2025)35.0% (2025)0
  • Youth and all-ages rates are seasonally adjusted (OECD); the latest month differs by country because statistical offices publish on different schedules.
  • Graduate gap = unemployment rate of tertiary-educated 25–34 year-olds minus that of 25–34 year-olds with upper-secondary education (latest year, OECD). A negative number means graduates fare better; a number near zero or positive means the usual degree advantage has gone.
  • “Jobless 12+ months” is the share of all unemployed people out a year or longer (OECD, latest year).
  • “Firms using AI”: Eurostat for the six EU countries (share of enterprises with 10+ staff, 2025 uses a revised survey so is not strictly comparable with earlier years); for the U.S., the Census Bureau’s Business Trends and Outlook Survey (24.6% of businesses of all sizes in the latest two-week period). The two measures differ in who is counted and are not directly comparable. No consistent figure is available here for the UK, Canada, Australia or Japan.
  • “Jobs cut citing AI” counts only layoff announcements NextChapter tracks, by the company’s home country and not where the jobs are lost; see the AI section above. Zero means none tracked, not none happened.
  • GDP growth is real annual growth for the latest full year (IMF World Economic Outlook; recent years may be estimates).
  • With eleven countries and few matched AI figures, this table is descriptive. It cannot show that AI adoption causes any of these differences.

Sources and data

  • U.S.: Census Bureau Current Population Survey basic monthly microdata, NextChapter calculation. Graduates are ages 22–27 with a bachelor’s degree or more; white-collar is Census major occupation groups 1–2 for the current or most recent job.
  • OECD Short-Term Labour Market Statistics (monthly, seasonally adjusted).
  • OECD Education at a Glance, unemployment by attainment, ages 25-34.
  • OECD unemployment by duration (12+ months).
  • IMF World Economic Outlook, real GDP growth (latest-year values are IMF estimates).
  • US Census Bureau Business Trends and Outlook Survey, share of businesses using AI in the last two weeks.
  • Eurostat isoc_eb_ai, enterprises with 10+ staff using any AI technology (EU only).

U.S. series (CSV)Peer countries (JSON)AI layoff announcements (CSV)

Data and charts may be republished with attribution under CC BY 4.0. Peer data refreshed 2026-10-24.

The job market, once a week

One email every Tuesday with the week's most useful read on the job market and the search, plus occasional news from NextChapter. No account needed. Unsubscribe any time.