← Search all jobs

Member of Technical Staff — Research, Operations & Decision Science

Causal

San Francisco, CA · Posted July 20, 2026

Just laid off? Start here: a plan for the first weeks

See every open role at Causal

More in California job market · All Member of Technical Staff jobs (336) · Non-profit & Social Impact · Engineering jobs

More roles at Causal

Similar jobs

Where San Francisco, CA ranks

Where San Francisco, CA placed in our monthly rankings, month by month. Each month stays online at its own address.

Pay compared with the market

This listing does not state pay. Across 133 open member of technical staff listings that state pay, the middle half runs $215,000 to $270,000 and the median is $240,000.

Listed pay is what employers advertise, not what people are paid.

Member of Technical Staff salaries by state · Check your own pay

How AI is used in this kind of work

Among software developers, AI is already used for some of the tasks. Measured exposure for software developers: 29% (some).

Share of this job’s tasks that AI is already used for at work, from real usage. It is not a forecast of job loss, and a low number means no use seen yet. Source: Anthropic Economic Index.

Check how this applies to your own job

About the job

Our mission is general causal intelligence; AI that is capable of (1) predicting the future and (2) identifying the actions to alter it.

To achieve this breakthrough, we are building a Large Physics foundation Model (LPM) because physical systems, unlike text or images, are governed by verifiable cause and effect. We believe that scaling on physics will enable an understanding of causality required to predict and control physical systems, starting with weather.

Our founding team has built and deployed AI against the physical world in robotics, drug discovery, and particle physics at institutions like DeepMind, Waymo, Cruise, Insitro, Nabla Bio, and CERN.

We look for domain experts who are excited to tackle unsolved problems. A prediction matters most when it leads to better decisions — and evaluating decision quality in high-stakes operational environments is a challenge on its own. Your mission is to bring that discipline to our reasoning research: defining the objectives our models optimize toward and the methods by which we judge whether their decisions are actually good.

Responsibilities

- Formulate the objectives, constraints, and decision problems that our reasoning models optimize toward

- Develop methodology for evaluating decision quality under uncertainty, including counterfactual reasoning about outcomes

- Translate the realities of complex operational environments into well-posed optimization and decision problems

- Bring rigor to how optimization and decision-making models are validated for real-world use

- Partner with reasoning, evaluation, and product teams to connect research to the decisions it ultimately informs

What we're looking for

We value a relentless approach to problem-solving, rapid execution, and the ability to quickly learn in unfamiliar domains.

- Deep expertise in operations research, decision science, or a closely related field (typically a PhD or equivalent experience)

- Strong grasp of optimization and decision-making under uncertainty, ideally including stochastic methods

- Experience in high-stakes operational settings where forecasts drive consequential decisions

- Particular strength in evaluating the quality of optimization or decision models, not just building them

- Ability to collaborate closely with ML researchers and translate operational realities into technical problems